When information must stop? To analyze what happened with the tragic case of Sarah Scazzi seem ever. E 'be that way? For forty days he dug in search of what I do not know even one life in full bloom, the life of a teenager "guilty" of being nice. There has been talk of her as a girl unsatisfied and have been attributed to friends of adults: how many times have we heard again and we read that "thirty-something chat with Sarah." At age 15, is perhaps forbidden talk to adults?
fantasies and falsehoods while she was already at the bottom of that damn well. Maybe those who have dug morbidly looking for something that was not there we would try better in the family of Sarah and Uncle ... in the fields of Information
not familiar longer any limit, the private and the pain does not count any more, all sacrificed on the altar of the news audience, profit. Why Federica Sciarelli and authors of "Who has seen" have not decided for the mother of Sarah's close connection with her? The decision was not submitted to a mother torn by grief and most obviously in the ball for the total situation and the news coming live. No, the TV gave us the fact of beating her mother in the face the terrible reality of a daughter and an uncle found dead murderess. You must stop, But no: the next room you hear the crying of her cousin Sarah, this is entertainment, and, you know: the show must go on ". While listening to
it comes to violence perpetrated against that because of Sarah's family was pure violence. It was necessary and it must stop. You have not done and it is wrong. To no avail, now, to invoke disciplinary measures, better would be an examination of conscience of whoever is responsible for what is proposed in television, to radio, online, in print: do not sacrifice everything and everyone on the altar of profit and audience , respect is wise, useful and important for everyone.
Daniel Damele
0 comments:
Post a Comment